Vince Sowerby: Negligence Per Se and Distracted Driving in Focus

Negligence per se is a law principle that simplifies the process of proving negligence in specific circumstances. Unlike general negligence claims, where plaintiffs must establish the defendant's duty of care, breach, causation, and damages, negligence per se automatically presumes a responsibility and breach when specific legal violations occur.

In summary, negligence per se applies when a defendant breaks a law or regulation designed to protect the public, and that violation directly causes harm to someone the law was intended to protect. This doctrine serves as a shortcut, allowing judges to focus on causation and damages rather than debating whether the defendant acted negligently.

One of the clearest examples of negligence per se is **driver distraction**, a behavior that has grown more common with the rise of smartphones and other distractions behind the wheel. Distracted driving laws, such as prohibitions against texting while driving, are designed to protect everyone on the road from avoidable accidents. When a person violates these laws and causes an accident, they can be found automatically negligent.

### How Negligence Per Se Works

For negligence per se to be relevant, four factors must generally be met:
1. **The defendant broke a statute or regulation** – For instance, texting while driving goes against laws in most states.
2. **The statute was enacted to prevent the type of harm that occurred** – Texting bans are intended to reduce car accidents caused by driver inattention.
3. **The plaintiff was among the group of people the law was designed to protect** – Road users, including drivers, passengers, cyclists, and pedestrians, are intended beneficiaries of distracted driving laws.
4. **The statutory violation caused the plaintiff’s injury** – A direct connection must exist between the violation and the harm, such as a crash caused by a driver who was texting.

When these criteria are met, the legal system presumes the defendant was negligent. This means the plaintiff doesn’t need to prove the defendant's behavior was unreasonable—only that it violated the law and resulted in harm.

### Distracted Driving as a Case Study

Consider this scenario: A driver glances at their phone to read a text message, runs a red light, and crashes into another vehicle. The driver broke a traffic law designed to prevent accidents, and their behavior directly caused harm. Under negligence per se, the injured party can argue that the statutory violation is enough to establish the driver’s negligence.

Watch Video

Vince Sowerby Discusses How Negligence Per Se Applies to Distracted Driving

Negligence per se is a law principle that streamlines the procedure of proving negligence in certain circumstances. Unlike general negligence claims, where plaintiffs must establish the defendant's obligation, breach, causation, and damages, negligence per se instantly presumes a duty and breach when particular legal violations occur.

In essence, negligence per se applies when a defendant breaks a statute or regulation designed to protect the public, and that violation clearly causes harm to a person the law was intended to protect. This doctrine serves as a shortcut, allowing judges to focus on causation and damages rather than debating whether the defendant was at fault.

One of the clearest examples of negligence per se is **distracted driving**, a behavior that has grown more common with the rise of smartphones and other distractions behind the wheel. Distracted driving laws, such as prohibitions against texting while driving, are designed to safeguard everyone on the road from preventable accidents. When someone breaks these laws and causes an accident, they can be found negligent per se.

### How Negligence Per Se Works

For negligence per se to be relevant, four factors must generally be met:
1. **The defendant broke a law or regulation** – For instance, texting while driving violates laws in most states.
2. **The statute was enacted to prevent the type of harm that occurred** – Texting bans aim to reduce car accidents caused by driver inattention.
3. **The plaintiff was among the group of people the law was designed to protect** – Road users, including motorists, passengers, cyclists, and pedestrians, are intended beneficiaries of distracted driving laws.
4. **The statutory violation caused the plaintiff’s injury** – A clear connection must be established between the violation and the harm, such as a collision caused by a driver who was texting.

When these criteria are met, the legal system presumes the defendant was negligent. This means the plaintiff doesn’t need to establish the defendant's behavior was careless—only that it violated the law and caused harm.

### Distracted Driving as a Case Study

Imagine this scenario: A driver checks their phone to read a text message, runs a red light, and crashes into another vehicle. The driver broke a traffic law designed to prevent accidents, and their behavior clearly caused harm. Under negligence per se, the injured party can argue that the statutory violation is enough to establish the driver’s negligence.

Watch Video

Vince Sowerby’s Insights on Distracted Driving as Negligence Per Se

Negligence Per Se is a law principle that streamlines the process of proving negligence in certain circumstances. Unlike general negligence claims, where individuals must establish the defendant's obligation, breach, causation, and damages, negligence per se instantly presumes a responsibility and breach when particular legal violations occur.

In summary, negligence per se applies when a defendant breaks a statute or regulation designed to protect the public, and that violation directly causes harm to a person the law was meant to protect. This doctrine serves as a streamlined approach, allowing courts to focus on causation and damages rather than debating whether the defendant acted negligently.

One of the clearest examples of negligence per se is **driver distraction**, a behavior that has become increasingly prevalent with the rise of smartphones and other distractions behind the wheel. Distracted driving laws, such as prohibitions against texting while driving, are designed to protect everyone on the road from preventable accidents. When someone breaks these laws and causes an accident, they can be found negligent per se.

### How Negligence Per Se Works

For negligence per se to be relevant, four elements must typically be met:
1. **The defendant violated a statute or regulation** – For instance, texting while driving goes against laws in most states.
2. **The law was enacted to prevent the type of harm that occurred** – Texting bans aim to reduce car accidents caused by driver inattention.
3. **The plaintiff was among the group of people the law was designed to protect** – Road users, including drivers, passengers, cyclists, and pedestrians, are intended beneficiaries of distracted driving laws.
4. **The statutory violation caused the plaintiff’s injury** – A direct connection must be established between the violation and the harm, such as a crash caused by a driver who was texting.

When these criteria are met, the court presumes the defendant was negligent. This means the plaintiff doesn’t need to establish the defendant's behavior was careless—only that it broke a statute and resulted in harm.

### Distracted Driving as a Case Study

Imagine this scenario: A driver glances at their phone to read a text message, runs a red light, and crashes into another vehicle. The driver violated a traffic law designed to prevent accidents, and their behavior directly caused harm. Under negligence per se, the injured party can argue that the statutory violation is enough to establish the driver’s negligence.

Watch Video

Vince Sowerby Covers Negligence Per Se with a Focus on Distracted Driving

Negligence per se is a legal doctrine that streamlines the procedure of proving negligence in specific circumstances. Unlike traditional negligence claims, where plaintiffs must establish the defendant's duty of care, breach, causation, and damages, negligence per se automatically presumes a duty and breach when specific legal violations occur.

In summary, negligence per se arises when a defendant violates a statute or regulation designed to protect the public, and that violation directly causes harm to someone the law was intended to protect. This legal principle serves as a streamlined approach, allowing judges to focus on causation and damages rather than debating whether the defendant was at fault.

One of the most common examples of negligence per se is **driver distraction**, a behavior that has become increasingly prevalent with the rise of smartphones and other distractions behind the wheel. Distracted driving laws, such as prohibitions against texting while driving, are designed to protect everyone on the road from preventable accidents. When a person violates these laws and causes an accident, they can be found negligent per se.

### How Negligence Per Se Works

For negligence per se to be relevant, four elements must generally be met:
1. **The defendant broke a statute or regulation** – For instance, texting while driving violates laws in most states.
2. **The law was enacted to prevent the type of harm that occurred** – Texting bans are intended to reduce car accidents caused by driver inattention.
3. **The plaintiff was among the group of people the law was designed to protect** – Road users, including motorists, passengers, cyclists, and pedestrians, are intended beneficiaries of distracted driving laws.
4. **The statutory violation caused the plaintiff’s injury** – A direct connection must exist between the violation and the harm, such as a collision caused by a driver who was texting.

When these criteria are met, the court presumes the defendant was negligent. This means the plaintiff doesn’t need to establish the defendant's behavior was unreasonable—only that it violated the law and resulted in harm.

### Distracted Driving as a Case Study

Consider this scenario: A driver glances at their phone to read a text message, runs a red light, and collides with another vehicle. The driver broke a traffic law designed to prevent accidents, and their behavior clearly caused harm. Under negligence per se, the injured party can argue that the statutory violation is enough to establish the driver’s negligence.

Watch Video

Vince Sowerby Delves into Negligence Per Se and Driver Distraction

Negligence per se is a legal doctrine that simplifies the procedure of proving negligence in specific circumstances. Unlike traditional negligence claims, where plaintiffs must establish the defendant's obligation, breach, causation, and damages, negligence per se instantly presumes a responsibility and breach when specific legal violations occur.

In summary, negligence per se arises when a defendant violates a statute or regulation designed to protect the public, and that violation directly causes harm to someone the law was meant to protect. This legal principle serves as a shortcut, allowing judges to focus on causation and damages rather than debating whether the defendant acted negligently.

One of the most common examples of negligence per se is **driver distraction**, a behavior that has become increasingly prevalent with the rise of smartphones and other distractions behind the wheel. Distracted driving laws, such as prohibitions against texting while driving, are designed to protect everyone on the road from avoidable accidents. When someone violates these laws and causes an accident, they can be found negligent per se.

### How Negligence Per Se Works

For negligence per se to apply, four elements must generally be met:
1. **The defendant violated a law or regulation** – For instance, texting while driving goes against laws in most states.
2. **The law was enacted to prevent the type of harm that occurred** – Texting bans are intended to reduce car accidents caused by driver inattention.
3. **The plaintiff was among the group of people the law was designed to protect** – Road users, including motorists, passengers, cyclists, and pedestrians, are intended beneficiaries of distracted driving laws.
4. **The statutory violation caused the plaintiff’s injury** – A direct connection must be established between the violation and the harm, such as a crash caused by a driver who was texting.

When these criteria are met, the court presumes the defendant was negligent. This means the plaintiff doesn’t need to prove the defendant's behavior was careless—only that it broke a statute and caused harm.

### Distracted Driving as a Case Study

Imagine this scenario: A driver checks their phone to read a text message, runs a red light, and crashes into another vehicle. The driver violated a traffic law designed to prevent accidents, and their behavior directly caused harm. Under negligence per se, the injured party can argue that the statutory violation is enough to establish the driver’s negligence.

Watch Video

Vince Sowerby on Understanding Negligence Per Se and Distracted Driving

Negligence Per Se is a law principle that simplifies the procedure of proving negligence in certain circumstances. Unlike traditional negligence claims, where plaintiffs must establish the defendant's obligation, breach, causation, and damages, negligence per se automatically presumes a responsibility and breach when specific legal violations occur.

In essence, negligence per se arises when a defendant violates a statute or regulation designed to protect the public, and that violation clearly causes harm to someone the law was meant to protect. This doctrine serves as a streamlined approach, allowing judges to focus on causation and damages rather than debating whether the defendant acted negligently.

One of the clearest examples of negligence per se is **driver distraction**, a behavior that has become increasingly prevalent with the rise of smartphones and other distractions behind the wheel. Distracted driving laws, such as prohibitions against texting while driving, are designed to safeguard everyone on the road from preventable accidents. When a person breaks these laws and causes an accident, they can be found automatically negligent.

### How Negligence Per Se Works

For negligence per se to be relevant, four factors must typically be met:
1. **The defendant violated a statute or regulation** – For instance, texting while driving goes against laws in most states.
2. **The law was enacted to prevent the type of harm that occurred** – Texting bans aim to reduce car accidents caused by driver inattention.
3. **The plaintiff was among the group of people the law was designed to protect** – Road users, including motorists, passengers, cyclists, and pedestrians, are intended beneficiaries of distracted driving laws.
4. **The statutory violation caused the plaintiff’s injury** – A clear connection must be established between the violation and the harm, such as a crash caused by a driver who was texting.

When these criteria are met, the legal system presumes the defendant was negligent. This means the plaintiff doesn’t need to establish the defendant's behavior was unreasonable—only that it violated the law and resulted in harm.

### Distracted Driving as a Case Study

Imagine this scenario: A driver checks their phone to read a text message, runs a red light, and collides with another vehicle. The driver violated a traffic law designed to prevent accidents, and their behavior clearly caused harm. Under negligence per se, the injured party can argue that the statutory violation is enough to establish the driver’s negligence.

Watch Video

Vince Sowerby Analyzes Distracted Driving as an Example of Negligence Per Se

Negligence Per Se is a law principle that simplifies the process of proving negligence in certain circumstances. Unlike general negligence claims, where individuals must establish the defendant's obligation, breach, causation, and damages, negligence per se instantly presumes a duty and breach when specific legal violations occur.

In summary, negligence per se arises when a defendant violates a law or regulation designed to protect the public, and that violation directly causes harm to a person the law was meant to protect. This legal principle serves as a streamlined approach, allowing judges to focus on causation and damages rather than debating whether the defendant acted negligently.

One of the most common examples of negligence per se is **distracted driving**, a behavior that has grown more common with the rise of smartphones and other distractions behind the wheel. Distracted driving laws, such as prohibitions against texting while driving, are designed to safeguard everyone on the road from preventable accidents. When someone breaks these laws and causes an accident, they can be found negligent per se.

### How Negligence Per Se Works

For negligence per se to apply, four factors must typically be met:
1. **The defendant violated a law or regulation** – For instance, texting while driving violates laws in most states.
2. **The statute was enacted to prevent the type of harm that occurred** – Texting bans aim to reduce car accidents caused by driver inattention.
3. **The plaintiff was among the group of people the law was designed to protect** – Road users, including motorists, passengers, cyclists, and pedestrians, are intended beneficiaries of distracted driving laws.
4. **The statutory violation caused the plaintiff’s injury** – A direct connection must exist between the violation and the harm, such as a collision caused by a driver who was texting.

When these criteria are met, the court presumes the defendant was negligent. This means the plaintiff doesn’t need to prove the defendant's behavior was unreasonable—only that it broke a statute and caused harm.

### Distracted Driving as a Case Study

Imagine this scenario: A driver glances at their phone to read a text message, runs a red light, and crashes into another vehicle. The driver violated a traffic law designed to prevent accidents, and their behavior clearly caused harm. Under negligence per se, the injured party can argue that the statutory violation is enough to establish the driver’s negligence.

Watch Video